ND Burma
ND-Burma formed in 2004 in order to provide a way for Burma human rights organizations to collaborate on the human rights documentation process. The 13 ND-Burma member organizations seek to collectively use the truth of what communities in Burma have endured to advocate for justice for victims. ND-Burma trains local organizations in human rights documentation; coordinates members’ input into a common database using Martus, a secure open-source software; and engages in joint-advocacy campaigns.
Recent Posts
- Myanmar military still bombing towns despite earthquake crisis, rebels say
- PRESS STATEMENT: CIVIL SOCIETY CALLS FOR DISASTER RELIEF FOR EARTHQUAKE SURVIVORS AND AFFECTED COMMUNITIES IN MYANMAR
- AAPP Launches its New Report on Justice, the Judiciary and the Weaponization of Law to Repress Civilians in Burma
- Junta offensives leave 4 dead, thousands displaced in northwest Myanmar
- Open letter: Special Envoy’s conflicts of interest signal urgent need for investigation and complete end of mandate
Open letter: Special Envoy’s conflicts of interest signal urgent need for investigation and complete end of mandate
/in Member statements, Press Releases and StatementsTo:
United Nations Secretary-General
United Nations General Assembly
Open letter: Special Envoy’s conflicts of interest signal urgent need for investigation and complete end of mandate
17 March 2025
We—the undersigned 290 Myanmar, regional, and international civil society organizations—call on United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres to urgently open an investigation into conflicts of interest over the business activities of UN Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Myanmar Julie Bishop and make the findings public. We also call on the UN General Assembly (UNGA) to immediately end the mandate of the Special Envoy, and on the Secretary-General to assume a leadership role in addressing the crisis in Myanmar directly.
We are alarmed by the Special Envoy’s business activities and connections to the mining industry and Chinese state-owned companies with possible or confirmed commercial interests in Myanmar, including Shenghe Resources and China Communications Construction Company. Her involvement with Chinese state-owned companies raises serious concerns about the impartiality and independence required to engage with China as the Special Envoy on Myanmar. Such conflicts of interest actively endanger the human rights of the Myanmar people as China remains a top source of military support and false legitimacy for the illegal military junta. The Chinese government is evidently aiding and abetting the junta’s ongoing crimes against humanity and war crimes against the Myanmar people.
The UN’s response thus far is wholly unacceptable. As the appointing authority, the UN Secretary-General bears a significant responsibility to the people of Myanmar to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the Special Envoy. That the UN would allow the Special Envoy tasked with addressing the Myanmar crisis to continue given such blatant commercial interests that jeopardize the lives of the people of Myanmar, is unconscionable.
The Special Envoy’s conflicts of interest are the latest reminder that the UN’s decades of peace-brokering attempts through special envoys and “dialogues” have produced absolutely no meaningful, positive change for the people of Myanmar. Instead, this ongoing approach continues to embolden the junta to commit atrocity crimes with complete impunity and harm the people of Myanmar. Given the outdated and ineffectual mandate, civil society organizations have previously called for the UN to abolish the position. The UN must transform its destructive approach into principled, ethical, and concerted efforts that fully respect the human rights of the Myanmar people and support their collective will to dismantle military tyranny.
This moment must finally mark the end of the UN’s relegation of responsibility on the crisis in Myanmar. We urge the UNGA to immediately revoke the mandate of the Special Envoy, particularly given the current Special Envoy’s conflicts of interest that jeopardize the lives of the Myanmar people.
We call on the Secretary-General to immediately open an investigation regarding these conflicts of interest and publish the findings. The Secretary-General must urgently take the lead to end the military junta’s terror campaign, ensure accountability for the perpetrators under international law, and robustly support the Myanmar people’s revolution to build sustainable peace and an inclusive federal democracy.
For more information, please contact:
Mulan, Blood Money Campaign; bloodmoneycampaign21@protonmail.com
Naw Aung, Defend Myanmar Democracy; communication@defendmyanmardemocracy.org
Naw Cherry, Karen Peace Support Network; kpsn14@gmail.com
Khin Ohmar, Progressive Voice; info@progressive-voice.org
UN chief: Discussing humanitarian aid corridor from Bangladesh to Myanmar
/in NewsAmid fighting in Rakhine state, immediate ‘dignified return’ for refugees is difficult, he says.
DHAKA, Bangladesh — The United Nations is discussing the possibility of a humanitarian aid corridor to Myanmar from Bangladesh in an effort to create equitable conditions for Rohingya refugees to eventually return, the U.N. chief said in Dhaka on Saturday.
However, the Rohingya refugees sheltering in Bangladesh could not make and immediate, “dignified return to their homeland in Myanmar’s Rakhine state amid the continued fighting there, added U.N. Secretary General António Guterres at a media briefing.
“We need to intensify the humanitarian aid inside Myanmar to create a condition for that return to be successful,” Guterres said on the penultimate day of his four-day visit to Bangladesh.
Setting up a humanitarian aid channel “is obviously a matter that would require authorization and cooperation,” he said without further specifying.
Humanitarian corridors are designated and secure routes that allow for the safe passage of humanitarian relief, according to Southeast Asian NGO Fortify Rights.
The NGO said this week that the Bangladesh government and the rebel Arakan Army comprising ethnic Rakhine should immediately facilitate humanitarian aid and cross-border trade to reach war-affected civilians the state.
“The crisis in Myanmar demands urgent global attention and action,” said Ejaz Min Khant in a statement Wednesday.
“A humanitarian corridor between Myanmar and Bangladesh would be a lifeline for civilians impacted by the conflict.”
The statement said Bangladesh should also lift restrictions on border trade with Myanmar “to help ease access to basic commodities for civilians in Rakhine state.”
The NGO noted that Bangladesh’s interim leader, Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus had said in an interview aired earlier this month on Sky News that his government was in ongoing negotiations with the Arakan Army to create a “safe zone” for Rohingya refugees to return to Rakhine.
Bangladesh’s Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain, who also spoke at the joint media briefing, said the establishment of a humanitarian channel was not discussed with the U.N. chief during his visit.
“This is much more of an operational matter, which we will of course deal [on] with the local offices of the U.N.,” Hossain said.
Nearly a million Rohingya, a persecuted minority Muslim community in Myanmar, live in refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar in southeastern Bangladesh.
Almost 800,000 of them crossed into neighboring Bangladesh to flee a deadly Myanmar military crackdown in 2017.
Their return to Rakhine has been prolonged after civil war broke out in Myanmar following the military coup of February 2021.
U.N. human rights experts had said on Thursday that the Myanmar junta had not been allowing in relief supplies, with the situation “particularly critical in Rakhine,” which is home to the Rohingya and other ethnic minorities.
Rakhine State was “on the brink of famine,” with two million people at risk of starvation, the statement added citing another U.N. agency.
Meanwhile, heavy fighting continues in Rakhine between the Myanmar military and the rebel Arakan Army, Guterres said on Saturday.
“There is a consensus that it would be extremely difficult in such a situation for an immediate and dignified return of the Rohingya,” he told the mrdia in Dhaka on Saturday.
Guterres further noted that in the past, the relationship between the ethnic Rakhine and the Rohingya has not been an easy one.
“So I think it is important to engage with the Arakan Army in order for ensure full respect of the rights of the Rohingya population in Rakhine,” the U.N. chief said.
The Arakan Army founded in 2009 is fighting to “liberate” Rakhine towards its goal of self-determination. It has made significant gains over the past year to root out the military and now controls a majority of Rakhine’s townships, reported radio Free Asia, a news service affiliated with BenarNews.
Comprising mainly Rakhine Buddhists, the Arakan Army claimed it respects the rights of Rohingya. But experts have said there was plenty of evidence that the Arakan Army carried out mass arson attacks on Rohingya villages in May and August last year.
Guterres again made an impassioned plea to donor nations for more humanitarian aid for the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, whose food ration is set to be cut by more than half starting next month due to a funds shortage.
“With the announced cuts in financial assistance, we are facing the dramatic risk of having only 40% in 2025 of the resources available for humanitarian aid in 2024,” he said.
“This would have terrible consequences starting with the drastic reduction of food rations. That would be an unmitigated disaster. People will suffer and people will die.”
He said that by offering the Rohingya refuge, Bangladesh had shown its humanitarian spirit.
“By offering Rohingya refugees sanctuary, Bangladesh has demonstrated solidarity and human dignity, often at significant social, environmental and economic cost,” he said.
“The world must not take this generosity for granted.”
RFA News
Rodrigo Roa Duterte makes first appearance before the ICC: confirmation of charges hearing scheduled for 23 September 2025
/in NewsToday, 14 March 2025, Rodrigo Roa Duterte (“Mr Duterte”) appeared before Pre-Trial Chamber I (“the Chamber”) of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “Court”). Mr Duterte is suspected of the crime against humanity of murder, allegedly committed in the Republic of the Philippines (“the Philippines”) between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019.
The Chamber verified the identity of the suspect and ensured that he was clearly informed of the crimes he is alleged to have committed and of his rights under the Rome Statute of the ICC in a language he fully understands and speaks.
Mr Duterte participated in the hearing via video link from the ICC Detention Centre, as authorised by the Chamber. The hearing was held in the presence of the ICC Prosecutor and the Defence. Mr Duterte was represented during the hearing by Mr Salvador C. Medialdea, and assisted by the Office of Public Counsel for the Defence.
The Chamber provisionally scheduled the confirmation of charges hearing to begin on 23 September 2025. The purpose of the confirmation of charges procedure is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to establish substantial grounds to believe that the person committed the crimes he or she is suspected of. If the charges are confirmed, totally or partly, the case will be transferred to a Trial Chamber, which will conduct the subsequent phase of the proceedings: the trial.
Image
Judges of Pre-Trial Chamber I during the initial appearance of Rodrigo Roa Duterte on 14 March 2025 ©ICC-CPI
Background: On 10 February 2025, the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC applied for an arrest warrant against Mr Duterte for the crimes against humanity of murder, torture and rape. The Chamber assessed the material submitted by the Prosecution and found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Duterte is individually responsible as an indirect co-perpetrator for the crime against humanity of murder, allegedly committed in the Philippines between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019.
The warrant of arrest against Mr Duterte was issued by the Chamber as “Secret” on 7 March 2025 and reclassified as “Public” on 11 March 2025. On 12 March 2025, Mr Duterte was surrendered to the International Criminal Court after being arrested by the authorities of the Republic of the Philippines in accordance with the warrant of arrest. He is currently in ICC custody.
The Philippines, an ICC State Party since 1 November 2011, deposited a written notification of withdrawal from the Statute on 17 March 2018. Under article 127 of the Statute, that withdrawal took effect on 17 March 2019. Nevertheless, the ICC retains jurisdiction over crimes allegedly committed in the Philippines while the country was a State Party to the Statute.
Warrant of Arrest for Mr Rodrigo Roa Duterte
More information on this case
Photographs of the hearing
Audio-visual materials:
Questions and Answers on the Initial appearance: English; French
ICC
Myanmar junta troops massacre 11 villagers, most too old to flee, residents say
/in NewsThe violence inflicted for years in minority areas comes to the central heartland.
Updated on March 10, 2025 at 1:39 p.m. ET
Read RFA coverage of this topic in Burmese.
Myanmar soldiers on a sweep through a central village known for its support of anti-junta forces killed 11 civilians, most of them too old to flee, residents of the area who saw the bodies told Radio Free Asia on Monday.
The Myanmar military has had an appalling human rights record for decades in its wars against ethnic minority guerrillas in remote frontier regions, independent investigators have said.
But violence over the past couple of years has been particularly brutal in central areas dominated by members of the majority Barmar community who, since a popular government was overthrown in a coup in 2021, have for the first time risen up in opposition to military rule.
All of those killed in Magway region’s Myay Sun Taw village were elderly apart from two, residents said.
“My father was left behind and didn’t escape the village. He’s elderly, so he’s attached to his home and didn’t run away. We were urging and calling for him but he didn’t follow us,” said the son of one of the victims.
“As far as I know, he was shot in the head. I feel devastated. This is my village, my people and my parents,” said the son, who declined to be identified for safety reasons.
Soldiers from the 101st Infantry Division Headquarters and three other battalions were involved in the sweep through the region that began on March 2, villagers said.
There was no battle to explain the soldiers’ actions as they raided the village, though the area is known to support pro-democracy fighters in paramilitary groups called People’s Defense Forces that have sprung up across the country since the coup, especially in the central Magway and Sagaing regions, residents said.
“They were all just civilians,” said one witness of the aftermath of the raid.
RFA called the junta’s spokesperson, Maj. Gen. Zaw Min Tun, to ask about the incident but he did not respond by the time of publication.
Residents identified the victims as a man in his 70s named Han Tin, a man in his 60s named Htay Myint, 88-year-old woman Than Ma Ni, 60-year old woman Than Pyae, 86-year-old woman Hla Ngwe, 67-year old man Kyi Htay, 69-year old man Aung Myaing, 35-year old man Thant Zin, 40-year-old man Aung Lin Naing, 70-year-old man Nyunt Wai, and 50-year-old man San Win.
Their bodies were discovered as villagers returned to the area on March 5 and 7, said a resident of Myay Sun Taw, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to security concerns.
Soldiers also burned down nearby Thar Gaung and Za Yat Ni villages, destroying about 600 homes and forcing some 10,000 people to flee.
Nway Oo, an official with the anti-junta Civil Defense and Security Organization of Myaung township, where the villages are located, told RFA that the military remains in Thar Gaung after suffering “heavy losses” when troops attempted to move into the town center.
“Now they are waiting for reinforcements,” he said, adding that “at least seven or eight soldiers were killed before the column retreated.
A representative of the anti-junta Yesagyo Township Information Committee, who also declined to be identified in fear of reprisals, noted that the military has “launched a lot of offensives in this region.
“Most villages are carrying out actions with armed groups to protect themselves,” he said. “The people killed in Myay Sun Taw were elderly and innocent. The military is malicious and extremely cruel.”
Translated by Kiana Duncan. Edited by RFA Staff.
RFA News
On International Women’s Day, the Network for Human RightsDocumentation – Burma Calls for the Recognition of Women’s Contributions to the Pro-Democracy Movement
/in Press Releases and StatementsOn International Women’s Day, the Network for Human Rights
Documentation – Burma Calls for the Recognition of Women’s Contributions to the Pro-Democracy Movement
8 March 2025
For Immediate Release
On International Women’s Day, the Network for Human Rights Documentation – Burma (ND-Burma) calls for the international community to recognize the resilience of women in the country’s democratic movement and to honour their commitments. For decades, a culture steeped in patriarchy has discriminated against women. Yet, they have consistently sought to challenge misogyny and ensure their voices are heard. ND-Burma condemns all forms of violence against women and girls and urges their participation in these revolutionary times to be acknowledged and encouraged.
Since the attempted coup on 1 February 2021, women’s rights have been under increased attack. The junta has sought to aggressively silence the calls of women of all generations through physical and verbal threats. Women and young girls have been unjustly arrested, detained and even killed for their activism. Their consistent and unwavering courage is evidence of their refusal to stand down in the wake of the military’s brutality.
With millions forcibly displayed across Burma, women-led organizations, including several ND-Burma members, have filled critical gaps in providing life-saving humanitarian assistance and leading awareness-raising sessions. By sharing knowledge about women’s rights with conflict-affected communities, they are empowered through access to information.
With all forms of violence on the rise, women’s organizations have not only provided pathways to safety through safe houses and counselling but have also upheld the dignity of survivors. Moreover, communities across the country struggle with the lack of accessible health care and educational opportunities; nevertheless, women increasingly take on these roles as teachers, nurses, and doctors to ensure that children and those with illnesses still have access to necessary services.
Women human rights defenders have consistently demonstrated the skills, leadership, and competencies needed to be on the frontlines of Burma’s pursuit for a federal democracy. They’ve taken on various roles and transcended gender norms and expectations by joining the frontlines of the armed resistance movement as soldiers, medics, and fundraisers. Despite the immense risk to their safety, they have also used their platforms to call for accountability for the junta’s war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Further, ND-Burma calls upon all actors in the pro-democracy movement, including those involved in local governance and the National Unity Government, to recognize the pursuit for federalism and gender equality simultaneously. The international community must stand with women and advocate for protecting and promoting their rights and freedoms in Burma. In accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR), women must be involved in the future of Burma’s political landscape.
Women must be supported and fiercely encouraged as they continue to challenge the status quo.
Media Contacts
Name: Nai Aue Mon
Signal: +66 86 1679 741
Name: San Htoi
Signal: +66 64 195 6721
ND-Burma was formed in 2004 to facilitate collaboration among Burmese human rights organizations on the human rights documentation process. The 13 ND-Burma member organizations seek to use the truth about what communities in Burma have endured to advocate for justice for victims.
Members
Partner Organizations
INTERVIEW: Why an Argentine court filed a warrant for Aung San Suu Kyi’s arrest
/in NewsFormer UN rights rapporteur explains court must remain impartial in lawsuit that accuses Myanmar of Rohingya genocide.
Tomas Ojea Quintana is a human rights lawyer who served as U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar between 2008 and 2014.
He represents the Burmese Rohingya Organization U.K., which filed a case in an Argentine court in 2019 that allege genocide and crimes against humanity were committed by senior Myanmar military officials against Rohingya Muslims.
Last week, Quintana told RFA that the Argentinian court had issued an arrest warrant for those named in the suit, including the de facto leader of the democratically-elected government, Aung San Suu Kyi.
She was deposed when the military took over the country in a 2021 coup and is believed to be under house arrest but the junta has not disclosed her exact location.
The Argentine suit was filed under the principle of “universal jurisdiction” enshrined in Argentina’s constitution, which holds that some crimes are so heinous that alleged perpetrators thousands of miles away can be tried.
Members of the deposed civilian government are named in the suit because they were in charge of the government in 2017, and Aung San Suu Kyi defended the military’s actions in 2019 to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, the Netherlands.
Members of Myanmar’s shadow National Unity Government, made up of other leaders deposed by the coup and their allies, have requested that Suu Kyi and other civilian leaders be removed from the arrest warrant because the Rohingya could be unfairly blamed for adding a blemish to the reputation of Myanmar’s most popular political figure. But Quintana said the court decided that she and the others must be included to show that the court is impartial.
The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
RFA: In our interview last year, you predicted that the Argentinian court would issue an arrest warrant for Aung San Suu Kyi and the others. Now, it has been realized. How significant do you think this warrant is for the Rohingya?
Quintana: We predicted that the Argentinian court would issue a warrant because we have been working very hard bringing evidence to the file in Argentina, bringing witnesses in person to give testimony, survivors to give testimony, to the court. And finally, the court understood what was at stake, which is the genocide against the Rohingya people.
And that’s why, after a request from the prosecutor and also a request from the Rohingya themselves, the court decided to issue this arrest warrant against 25 individuals.
And you are asking me how significant this is. I would say that we should ask the Rohingya community how they feel about it. My thought is that the Rohingya really welcome this decision because basically this decision recognizes the truth about the genocide committed in Burma in 2017.
It is the first step towards justice, in identifying the perpetrator and issuing international warrants to bring them to Buenos Aires, Argentina, to be accountable to the Argentinian court. This is a first step and I think is very significant, not only for the Rohingya but also for the overall Burmese community and for the other ethnic minorities. Because all of them have been facing and suffering decades of human rights abuses by the military in Myanmar.
RFA: The arrest warrant from Argentinian court includes Aung San Suu Kyi and former President Htin Kyaw. In this regard, the Rohingya activists who have filed the lawsuit told RFA that they included the civilian leaders’ names in the original filing in 2019. But after the military coup in 2021, they reviewed the decision. And in December 2023, they requested that the court exclude their names from the arrest warrant. But it still included their names when it was release. Can you tell me what happened?
Quintana: I would be very transparent in what the position of Burmese Rohingya Organization U.K. is and what my position is as their attorney. In fact, in the 2019 complaint, the Burmese Refugee Organization U.K. decided to describe what happened in Burma for decades and in particular in 2017, naming all those who might have been responsible, and that would include those who executed orders and issued the orders.
I’m talking about the military, but also all others who have had some level of responsibility. I’m talking about civilians and any leaders and so on and so forth.
We have been working with the court here in Argentina, providing evidence about the responsibility of the military. And that’s why … we made a request to the court of arrest warrants. We included the military because we understood that, due to the coup in Burma in 2021,… Aung San Suu Kyi has been persecuted by the military.
I should say that I met her in Burma three times in different circumstances. I know Aung San Suu Kyi.
Now while we are talking, she’s incarcerated. We thought that it was convenient in this first stage of the procedure in Argentina, the judicial procedure to target the military while they are still in power in Burma. Now, the court decided otherwise here.
Bear in mind how Aung San Suu Kyi reacted in 2017. Bear in mind that in 2017, the government officially was a civilian government, regardless of the lack of direct control that the civilian government had over the military….
Bear in mind that even during that time, in 2016 and 2017, the Rohingya continued to face this grave and systematic discrimination, restricting access to basic livelihoods, access to food and health, etc. Finally bearing in mind what Aung San Suu Kyi said before the International Court of Justice during the proceedings (in 2019) where she defended the military and the ethnic cleansing operations.
All these reasons made the court decide to include her in the list of arrest warrants. The 25 listed warrants therefore include Aung San Suu Kyi.
RFA: The National Unity Government called for removal of the civilian leader’s names from the arrest warrant list. What would be your response?
Quintana: Frankly speaking, what we have been receiving is support in general, from not only ethnic groups, but also Burmese people about these arrest warrants.
I can recall one of those messages where they say that if the court would exclude Aung San Suu Kyi from the arrest warrant, that will send the wrong message to the outside world about the lack of impartiality of the Argentinian court.
So, in general, the messages support the list of warrants. We know that others, and especially the NUG has made some observations about her being included in the warrant and even suggesting to exclude her. But that’s out of our hands. This is a decision of the jurisdiction. The court is an independent, impartial court that will respect basic rights of defendants.
Everyone will have the right to defend themselves here with an attorney, and it’s out of our hands to take her out of the list. We tried that before the warrants were issued as I said before.
We met the court, and we explained to the court the risk that the Rohingya may face if Aung San Suu Kyi is included in the list because the Rohingya may be blamed for her being included in the list. But the court decided they want to keep in mind the whole picture and the history of the facts.
RFA: By being included in the arrest warrant list, does it mean that the civilian leaders should have the same level of responsibility (as the military) for the crimes committed against the Rohingya?
Quintana: The criminal process here is just starting. This is a first step to issue arrest warrants. And then the court will determine the nature and the kind of responsibility that each of the perpetrators have. In our view, there is a clear distinction between the responsibility of the military who planned and ordered the ethnic cleansing operations and committed the crimes on the ground, killing Rohingyas, raping women, burning down villages and so on and so forth.
The responsibility of the civilian government is different, and it will be for the court to determine what is the level of complicity of the civilian authorities with this genocide.
RFA: Learning from the past, lawsuits filed under the universal jurisdiction do not go very far to the point of actual arrest, extradition, or conviction and sentencing. How far do you think this case will go?
Quintana: The lawsuit should go as far as it can because the Rohingya are pursuing justice. And justice means to have a public trial where the victims can express their grievances. And then the court will issue a sentence that could be a conviction.
Look, when the case was filed in 2019. Most people were reluctant, were pessimistic about the challenge of bringing a universal jurisdiction case in Argentina. I remember very well that it was 2019. People were saying “What were you aiming at? I mean, nothing will happen.” And the reality is that throughout these years, a lot of things have been achieved.
First, empowerment of the Rohingya people and the notion that they deserve justice and they can do action to achieve justice. And now we have an arrest warrant, an international arrest warrant. Very soon it will go to Interpol. So this international organization will get involved, and we will work hard with all partners.
Basically we encourage the international community, and all members of the United Nations. The United Nations has been passing resolutions for many years condemning the crimes of the military, condemning the genocide of the Rohingya.
Now, this is the time for all of those countries to basically respond to that commitment and to take action. So we’ll see how the developments go. We’ll see what will happen with these perpetrators. The military should immediately release Aung San Suu Kyi so she can start working on her defense for the case here.
So we urge the military to release Aung San Suu Kyi from prison so she can respond to the Argentinian court. There are a lot of challenges, of course, and obstacles, but they also a lot of opportunities. We are raising the bar of commitment towards accountability. In this turmoil(-filled) world, where everything is under question, it is very important to have this arrest warrant, because it’s a reaffirmation of what we believe is important, which is respect and protection of human rights.
RFA News