ND Burma
ND-Burma formed in 2004 in order to provide a way for Burma human rights organizations to collaborate on the human rights documentation process. The 13 ND-Burma member organizations seek to collectively use the truth of what communities in Burma have endured to advocate for justice for victims. ND-Burma trains local organizations in human rights documentation; coordinates members’ input into a common database using Martus, a secure open-source software; and engages in joint-advocacy campaigns.
Political Prisoners Must Be Free: A Statement on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s 81st Birthday
/in Member statementsPolitical Prisoners Must Be Free: A Statement on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s 81st Birthday
This 19th June, 2026, marks the 81st birthday of Burma’s State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. She has spent around 20 years in detention or under house arrest since 1989 for her participation in politics and her longstanding commitment to democracy in Burma.
The continued detention of political prisoners, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, stands as evidence of the junta’s ongoing efforts to overturn democratic outcomes, nullify the will of the electorate, and deny the people of Burma their fundamental right to choose their own government.
On her 81st birthday, we reiterate calls for key stakeholders, including ASEAN Members, governments, UN mandates and domestic actors to,
• Demand Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s immediate and unconditional release along with all other political prisoners, not merely in words but through concrete, coordinated pressure on the junta to act;
• Support the Proof of Life campaign, ensure her family is granted immediate access and independent observers are permitted to verify her condition without delay; and
• Reaffirm that any political process excluding Burma’s democratically elected representatives lacks legitimacy and must not be recognized by key stakeholders.
“Now, all revolutionary forces must unite to secure the release of State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners.”
english
From the Ground Up: Local Calls for Safety and Protection in Southeastern Burma
/in Member statementsThe Human Rights Foundation of Monland Releases a New Report:
From the Ground Up: Local Calls for Safety and Protection in Southeastern Burma
For Immediate Release
18 June 2026
A new report from the Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM) released today
highlights local demands for peaceful democratic reform and peace in Burma. The report
features testimonies and case studies from ‘From the Ground Up: Local Calls for Safety and
Protection in Southeastern Burma,’ which include appeals to revolutionary and resistance
armed groups, interim federal authorities, and the National Unity Government. Five years
after the unsuccessful coup, residents in HURFOM’s focus areas—Mon State, Karen State,
and the Tanintharyi Region—are seeking answers.
The most pressing concern shared was protection. With millions displaced across the
country, the junta’s attacks are displacing people at a volatile and increasing rate. While
revolutionary groups are working to resist these assaults and defend communities in their
controlled areas, those affected by daily hostilities want to know that systems, plans and
effective coordination are in place to prioritize and safeguard their safety. The most
vulnerable are carrying the burden of the struggle.
Although the spirits of the various pro-democracy movements remain unbroken, they
have encountered significant challenges. Unlawful attacks against human rights
defenders, as well as on places of worship, schools, clinics, and others, have targeted
everyone. Burma’s dictatorship persists due to impunity, and the international community
has been slow to react to the crisis’s urgency.
Emerging federal governments and institutions are working to challenge the junta’s
legitimacy while aiming to govern in accordance with federal ideals. Meanwhile, local
populations find themselves caught in the conflict between stakeholders. The formation of
new governance bodies during fragile interactions has led to increased caution among
residents. These concerns are becoming more prominent, especially regarding
accountability and oversight of policies intended to prioritize civilian safety.
Further, this report examines the intricacies and complexities in greater detail and
ultimately concludes that communities do not want to live only as victims. They want to
survive, but they also want to rebuild. They want local systems that are safer, fairer, and
more accountable than what they experienced under military rule. They want federal
governance to mean something in daily life, not only in political speeches. For villagers,
federalism begins when local leaders listen.
Media Contact
Nai Aue Mon, HURFOM Program Director
Email: auemon@rehmonnya.org
Signal: +66 86 167 9741
FROM THEGROUND UP
/in ND-Burma Members' ReportsToday, HURFOM releases our latest report, ‘From the Ground Up,’ which highlights local demands for democratic reform and peace in Burma. Five years after the unsuccessful coup, those in our targeted areas are seeking answers.
Releases New Briefing Paper | Democracy Dies Where Dictators Thrive
/in Press Releases and StatementsThe Network for Human Rights Documentation-Burma (ND-Burma) Releases a
New Briefing Paper | Democracy Dies Where Dictators Thrive: Human Rights Violations by the Military Junta Post-Sham Election
16 June 2026
Today, the Network for Human Rights Documentation-Burma (ND-Burma) releases its latest briefing paper addressing the junta’s sham election ploy and the human rights violations that have followed. Since the attempted coup in 2021, the military has schemed to fool the international community through its bid for legitimacy. Global and regional stakeholders must not acknowledge or recognize the junta leadership as a government of any kind. The briefing paper released by ND-Burma serves as further evidence of the ongoing perpetration of crimes against civilians since coup leader Min Aung Hlaing asserted himself as the President of Burma.
ND-Burma members have continued to document the worsening human rights situation on the ground. This briefing paper includes member data and media coverage of air and ground attacks. The military junta has neither ceased nor slowed its attacks against innocent civilians. Conflict-affected communities across Burma are in urgent need of basic shelter, medicine, food and clean water. As thousands are deprived of their humanity, the junta is lauding itself as the rightful ruler, despite having no credibility.
Gaps in support for affected populations continue to widen amid a funding crisis that has increasingly limited many organizations’ ability to provide emergency humanitarian assistance to those who remain displaced. The Burma Army has weaponized aid, making it difficult to safely deliver life-saving items. While the resilience of resistance leaders and community human rights defenders endures, their voices must be heard as agents of change and as those dedicated to a lasting peace in the country, one that does not include militarized control.
Additional pressure is required to hold the military accountable for its crimes against humanity. Vulnerable groups have suffered oppression and denial of their basic rights and freedoms, and this will persist as the crisis deepens. We urge global stakeholders to cut all ties with the terrorist military junta. Support, resources, and funding should be directed toward the pro-democracy movement and human rights defenders driving positive change, especially civil society organizations providing local social services, including cross-border aid.
For more information:
Name: Nai Aue Mon
Signal: +66 86 1679 741
Name: San Htoi
Signal: +66 657549336
The Network for Human Rights Documentation-Burma (ND-Burma) comprises 13 organizations representing diverse ethnic nationalities, women, and former political prisoners. Since 2004, ND-Burma member organizations have documented human rights abuses and advocated for justice on behalf of victims. The network has nine full members and four affiliate members
Democracy Dies Where Dictators Thrive
/in Briefing Papers, ND-Burma's ReportsHuman Rights Violations by the Military Junta Post-Sham Election
More than five years after the attempted coup in Burma on 1 February 2021, coup leader Min Aung Hlaing declared himself president on 3 April 2026.[1] Weeks later, on April 20, the junta announced a ‘100-Day Plan’ outlining its intention to seek peace, economic recovery, and infrastructure modernization, and to invite armed groups to negotiations.[2] This is the latest sham effort by the junta to mislead the international community with diplomatic theatre that lacks credibility, especially as conflict continues to rage across most of the country.
Min Aung Hlaing’s self-appointment led him to claim that “Myanmar has returned to the path of democracy.”[3] Such a statement deliberately ignores the devastating impacts of human rights on civilians. A civil war waged by the junta has plunged thousands into irreversible poverty, decimated progress towards gender equality and protections for the most vulnerable, and eroded livelihood pathways, such as agriculture, on which the majority of civilians in rural areas depend to sustain themselves. The international community must not be fooled. In the short period between early April and mid-May 2026, despite the junta’s so-called commitment to ‘peace and security,’ attacks against civilians were widespread. Over 140 civilians have been killed by airstrikes alone since the 100-day peace announcement, with nearly 300 aerial attacks taking place between 20 April and 1 June.[4]
The suffering of the nation’s people has not been of concern to the dictators of Burma, who have continued to seek illicit pathways to grow their profits at the cost of local lives. Military-aligned companies have consolidated economic control, allowing them to prosper despite facing several sanctions across Europe and North America. By extension, crony companies serve as key joint venture partners and de facto regulators for state-owned enterprises overseen by the junta’s Ministry of Natural Resources, facilitating the lucrative extraction and export of minerals that are mined on the backs of local workers, who are underpaid, exploited, and employed as day labourers in resource-rich regions of the country.[5]
While millions displaced are subjected to immense hardships, including a lack of clean water, adequate shelter and nutrition, a rigged and corrupt election resulted in yet another illegal power-grab that the terrorist regime is now using as a catapult to assert legitimacy through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and international stakeholders. While ASEAN did not formally recognize the sham election, problematic engagement has increased since coup leader Min Aung Hlaing made himself President, including through diplomatic outreach. Thailand, in particular, has sought to bring Burma back into the regional bloc by encouraging its invitation to various summits and meetings.[6] The junta also continues to seek support from China, Russia and India to leverage their position.
As the junta embraces their illegal rule, it is critical to note that voting did not take place in every part of the country due to conflict ravaging many areas, making it impossible to cast ballots.[7] Nevertheless, the junta has insisted that their supposed victory was a ‘landslide.’ In reality, extractive and intimidating practices were carried out by junta supporters and members of the Burma Army to violently coerce civilians in local villages and towns to vote for the pro-military Union Solidarity and Development Party. [8]
In addition, the hijacking of the legal system continued with laws going into effect which directly undermined voter independence and integrity, including the Law on the Protection of Multiparty Democratic General Elections, which criminalized speaking out or inciting violence against the election or election workers.[9] Jail sentences for those found guilty were three years to a maximum of life imprisonment or even the death penalty.[10] This blatant weaponization of the rule of law led to the unlawful detainment of civilians.[11]
Attacks also dramatically increased in areas where the junta was seeking to control areas to hold voting, where once again civilians were forced to bear the impact of the junta’s volatility.[12] In the lead-up to the December 2025 vote, the military engaged in a widespread civilian-targeting campaign, recording over 210 deadly attacks that resulted in at least 191 civilian fatalities between December 28, 2025 and late January 2026.[13]
Prior to the sham election, the former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Tom Andrews, unequivocally rejected the military junta’s so-called election, declaring it neither free, fair, nor legitimate.[14] There were also warnings to observers that this election would be rigged as it occurred with ‘total surveillance.’[15] “To endorse an election under these conditions is to endorse both physical and digital repression,” stated ND-Burma member organization, the Human Rights Foundation of Monland.[16]
While the junta moves to expand its presence in parliament, loyalists to the regime are carrying out an authoritarian agenda in which human rights violations are being perpetrated daily. The democratic opposition and the emerging federal bodies have been branded ‘armed terrorist factions,’ and face daily threats to their well-being and security. Thousands have been killed in the last five years, with the situation looking to only worsen as 16 million people are in need of life-saving humanitarian assistance.[17]
Further, this briefing paper by the Network for Human Rights Documentation-Burma (ND-Burma) will draw on a combination of desk research, cases, and case studies from our member organizations to highlight how military impunity persists in the aftermath of the sham election and, specifically, how human rights violations have continued since the junta announced its 100-Day plan.
It is clear that the ruling regime has no intention of promoting or protecting human rights. ND-Burma strongly calls on the international community not to be fooled by the election, which not only lacked transparency but also failed to meet basic electoral standards. [18] As human rights violations continue, accountability is needed to ensure justice for victims.
Myanmar: Junta Massacre in Bago Highlights Need for International Accountability
/in NewsNew investigation documents deadly airstrike on Buddhist monastery sheltering civilians
(BANGKOK, June 9, 2026)–The Myanmar military junta committed war crimes in Bago Region on March 5 this year when it conducted an airstrike on a Buddhist monastery sheltering civilians, opened fire on civilians from the ground, and arbitrarily detained survivors, said Fortify Rights today. A new investigation reveals how the junta’s airstrike on the monastery and ground attack on civilians killed 28 civilians, including women and children.
U.N. member states should urgently increase support for international accountability for ongoing and unmitigated mass atrocity crimes in Myanmar and should reject coup-leader Min Aung Hlaing’s attempts to legitimize military rule, said Fortify Rights. U.N. member states should also provide political, economic, and material support for Myanmar’s home-grown democratic movement, including the National Unity Government (NUG) and state-level governance initiatives.
The possible war crimes documented by Fortify Rights in Bago Region took place on March 5, 2026, in Yae Twin Kone village tract, where Myanmar military junta forces bombed the local monastery, entered villages, and detained civilians, according to survivor testimony and pro-democracy forces on the ground. Two days later, on March 7, pro-democracy forces carried out a rescue operation to free the civilians detained by the military junta.
In March and April 2026, Fortify Rights was in Bago Region and interviewed 13 individuals about the detention of civilians and bombing of a Buddhist monastery, including survivors and witnesses, resistance fighters, and medical workers. Fortify Rights conducted all interviews in person and reviewed photographs of civilians killed at the monastery, as well as drone footage documenting civilians in junta detention, provided by members of a local People’s Defense Force (PDF). The NUG in Bago Region also provided Fortify Rights with casualty records, including the names of 26 people killed in the airstrike on March 5 and another two killed in Yae Twin Kone village tract. Fortify Rights was unable to independently verify all of the names on the list.
According to information received and analyzed by Fortify Rights, in the early morning of March 5, 2026, Myanmar junta columns from Light Infantry Battalion 20, Infantry Battalion 264, and Light Infantry Battalion 439—under Light Infantry Division 77—entered Yae Twin Kone village tract and carried out attacks, including killings and arbitrary detentions. Civilian survivors said the Myanmar military opened fire on local residents, conducted an airstrike on the local monastery sheltering civilians, and deployed at least one drone attack, killing a total of 28 civilians.
One survivor, 43, whose wife and son were killed by the junta on March 5, described to Fortify Rights how Myanmar military junta soldiers detained him alongside dozens of villagers in Kyaung Kone village before conducting an airstrike on the nearby Buddhist monastery.
“Around 5 a.m., I woke up and took my motorbike to harvest peanuts,” he said. “When I was leaving, the military arrested me. They had already arrested other people. I was arrested around 5:30 a.m.”
The survivor continued: “They tied our hands together with a long rope. They told us, ‘You are PDF.’ We explained, ‘We are not PDF.’ They accused us, saying, ‘Don’t lie. We will cut your balls.’”
This survivor estimated that between 30 to 40 Myanmar junta soldiers were present with his group of detained civilians, all wearing military uniforms and speaking Burmese: “We know the difference between the PDF and the military,” he said.
The man also described soldiers appearing intoxicated after snorting a white powdery substance while operating inside the village. He told Fortify Rights:
Fortify Rights was unable to independently verify the exact substance used by the soldiers. However, substance abuse—particularly of illicit stimulants—among Myanmar junta soldiers is well-documented and has often been linked to violent and unpredictable behavior during military operations.
While lying face down on the ground with his hands tied behind his back, this witness said he overheard soldiers communicating by walkie-talkie about attacking the monastery inside the village. He told Fortify Rights:
The survivor later heard a soldier report over the radio: “We shot one kid.” Afterward, the man realized the soldier was referring to his son, whom the junta killed in the incident.
“My son is 14 years old,” he said. “He was afraid, and he ran, but they shot him.”
Junta soldiers released this survivor and allowed him to return home at night, but the soldiers threatened to shoot him if he or others fled the area. Upon release, he searched for his family and described the moment he found them: “I went to the [Buddhist] monastery [where the airstrike had hit] and saw my wife’s dead body. … I saw her body in a corner. … I found my son dead near a bell.”
The military allowed survivors to have a burial ceremony on March 6 to bury 26 civilians killed in the airstrike and two dead from reported shootings in the village. The bodies were buried in two mass graves.
This witness insisted the attack was deliberate and not the result of crossfire between the military and resistance forces, saying: “At that time, [the soldiers] were already near the monastery. We told them, ‘PDF is not in the village.’ The soldiers knew there was no resistance.”
He believed the motive behind the attack was clear: “The military wanted us to stop supporting the resistance.”
For decades, the U.N., governments, non-governmental organizations, and journalists have documented how the Myanmar military has deliberately targeted civilians as part of a broader strategy to sever popular support for democratic resistance movements and ethnic resistance organizations. Through airstrikes, village burnings, arbitrary arrests, torture, forced displacement, and attacks on civilian infrastructure, the junta has repeatedly sought to terrorize communities into submission and punish populations perceived to support opposition forces.
In Yae Twin Kone village tract, NUG aerial footage on file with Fortify Rights shows more than 20 residents in civilian clothes lying face-down on the ground as villagers dig a grave nearby for bodies wrapped in cloth.
* * *
Another resident, 43, told Fortify Rights that junta soldiers held her hostage in Yae Twin Kone village tract after detaining her on the morning of March 5 while she was on her way to give alms:
The woman overheard the orders to attack the Buddhist monastery. She said:
She continued:
When asked why villagers were detained, and why the area was targeted in airstrikes, she said: “I believe that the soldiers thought we were supporting the resistance soldiers.”
* * *
Another resident from Kyaung Kone village told Fortify Rights that he was part of a small team that went to the Buddhist monastery after the airstrike, saying:
Upon arriving at the monastery, the man explained that he helped several young people flee the scene: “One was injured on the head. He was bleeding, a boy. The blood came down his face. When I came to the temple, the young people said, ‘Please help me, uncle.’”
Later, the man helped carry a wounded woman, telling Fortify Rights:
Fortify Rights showed the man photographs of the Buddhist monastery, and he described the building’s details, including the direction from which he entered. He said: “The monastery was totally destroyed. … The roof was completely gone. The first floor collapsed to the ground. It was concrete, and the floor is wood.”
The man also reported seeing a dead pregnant woman in the monastery: “The pregnant woman was dead, and the baby’s hand was coming out of her stomach. … She was going to deliver the baby soon.”
The man also described assisting with the burial in two mass graves on March 6, saying:
* * *
According to the NUG, on March 7, PDF units under the NUG Ministry of Defense, together with the Karen National Liberation Army— the armed wing of the Karen National Union, one of Myanmar’s oldest ethnic resistance organizations—conducted the rescue operation to free civilians detained.
So Daw, a PDF commander, described the high-stakes rescue mission launched after learning that the junta had arbitrarily detained civilians. Although the operation succeeded in freeing the civilians, he told Fortify Rights it was “extremely risky.”
A commando from the PDF Spring Warrior Column described how they entered the village after 10 p.m. on March 7 to push junta forces out and rescue the civilian hostages. As the military junta retreated, the fighters supported civilians fleeing. “I was guiding them,” the PDF soldier explained from a makeshift clinic bed, where he was recovering from wounds sustained just a week after the rescue in a different battle in Bago. “Children were holding my hand as I led them out [on March 7]. We carried an older, wounded woman on a stretcher made from bamboo and a longyi.”
The detention of civilians and attacks on civilians in Bago may amount to serious violations of international humanitarian law. Since the military coup in 2021, armed conflict between the Myanmar military junta and pro-democratic resistance forces has intensified nationwide.
Bago has become one of the most strategically significant battlegrounds in the effort to overthrow the military junta that illegally seized power in 2021. Located between Yangon, the country’s largest city, and the military capital Naypyidaw, the region serves as a critical corridor. In recent years, revolutionary forces have established strongholds in parts of Bago, increasingly challenging the junta’s control.
Under international humanitarian law, or the laws of war, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, parties to an armed conflict are prohibited from committing “violence to life and person,” including murder, mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture of persons taking no active part in hostilities. Common Article 3 also prohibits the taking of hostages and requires humane treatment of civilians and other protected persons.
The bombing of a Buddhist monastery sheltering civilians and the killing of an unarmed 14-year-old boy may constitute war crimes under international law. Parties to an armed conflict are required at all times to distinguish between combatants and military objectives, which may be lawfully targeted, and civilians and civilian objects—including religious sites—which are protected from attack unless and for such time as they are being used for military purposes. Parties must also take all feasible precautions to verify that targets are military objectives and to minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects.
The Myanmar military junta’s repeated airstrikes on civilian areas in places like Bago Region, Karenni and Kachin states, and elsewhere do not serve any legitimate military purpose and likely constitute war crimes. These attacks continue a broader pattern of junta attacks against civilian targets throughout the country, said Fortify Rights.
Photo credit: A father mourns the loss of his wife and son following a Myanmar military junta attack in Bago Region on March 5, 2026. ©Brennan O’Connor, 2026.
Fortifyrights