Blog Elements – Page 3

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

August 11, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

Date: 11 August 2026 To the Leadership and Representatives of the ICRC, We, the undersigned 155 Myanmar, regional and international civil society organizations, write to you today with a profound sense of urgency and deep frustration regarding the 3 August 2026 meeting between your resident representative, Arnaud de Baecque, and Myanmar’s State Counsellor, Daw Aung San Suu […]

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

August 7, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

[BANGKOK, 7 August 2026] We, the undersigned 146 Myanmar, regional, and international civil society organizations, express deep alarm and concern regarding reports that the junta-controlled Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) has announced its intention to assume the Chairship of the Southeast Asia National Human Rights Institutions Forum (SEANF) in 2027, following discussions during the second Technical Working Group Meeting of SEANF […]

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

August 11, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

August 7, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

August 11, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

Date: 11 August 2026

To the Leadership and Representatives of the ICRC,

We, the undersigned 155 Myanmar, regional and international civil society organizations, write to you today with a profound sense of urgency and deep frustration regarding the 3 August 2026 meeting between your resident representative, Arnaud de Baecque, and Myanmar’s State Counsellor, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.

While any contact with the State Counsellor, who is being unlawfully imprisoned by the illegal military junta in Myanmar, is a matter of intense public interest, the sequence of events surrounding this visit illustrates our greatest fear: the ICRC’s mandate is being actively exploited by the military junta. The meeting demonstrated how humanitarian engagement in Myanmar is increasingly vulnerable to political instrumentalization by the military junta, thereby aiding them to advance their political aims, and in turn prolonging the suffering of the Myanmar people and undermining their expressed democratic will and aspirations.

The junta first publicized the meeting, releasing carefully curated photographs of handshakes and a birthday cake to project an illusion of normalcy and cooperation to the international community as it desperately seeks legitimacy for its violently imposed rule. Only after this propaganda was disseminated did the ICRC issue a brief, reactionary confirmation.

In your statement, you noted that the visit followed “established guidelines” and permitted a “private conversation,” and you added that, per your standard procedures, all observations regarding her condition are kept strictly confidential and shared only with detaining authorities. You disclosed nothing regarding her health, her whereabouts, or the reality of her captivity.

A short, sanitized announcement is NOT enough. When the ICRC allows the military junta to exploit its presence as a credible international humanitarian organization for propaganda to advance its political agenda while remaining silent about the realities of the situation, the ICRC is no longer practicing neutrality. The ICRC is instead complicit in the military junta’s theater and blatant violations of international humanitarian law.

We anticipate the ICRC’s defence. We know it will rest upon the Fundamental Principles of the ICRC Movement, particularly neutrality, independence and confidentiality. We recognize that confidential dialogue is intended to secure humanitarian access and protect those deprived of their liberty. However, humanitarian engagement also carries a responsibility to safeguard its integrity from political exploitation.

The political instrumentalization of this visit was entirely foreseeable. The military junta has, for more than five years, consistently exploited humanitarian and diplomatic engagement to extract legitimacy and project an image of normalcy. Given this well-established pattern, the ICRC had a responsibility to anticipate and actively prevent such exploitation. The public dissemination of carefully staged photographs and messaging by the junta was not an unforeseeable consequence—it was an entirely predictable outcome.

Against this backdrop, we must ask: was the ICRC protecting its humanitarian mandate, or merely accommodating the military junta’s need in turn to protect the ICRC? An honest examination of your own doctrine reveals that your current approach is failing the very principles you claim to uphold:

Humanity is the Supreme Principle; Neutrality is a Tool: The first principle of your movement is to prevent and alleviate human suffering. Neutrality is not an end in itself. It exists to advance the principle of humanity by enabling access to those in need. When neutrality is repeatedly exploited to generate political legitimacy for violators of international law without extracting corresponding humanitarian gains from them, the relationship between means and ends deserves urgent reassessment.
The Premise of Confidential Dialogue has been Destroyed: The ICRC’s doctrine of confidentiality assumes good faith, that private dialogue with authorities will lead to tangible improvements for detainees. After more than five years of widespread arbitrary detention, torture, incommunicado detention and denial of independent monitoring, what measurable humanitarian improvements has confidential dialogue achieved for twenty thousand political detainees in Myanmar?
The Mandate Allows for Public Denunciation: The ICRC’s own guidelines state that confidentiality is not absolute. You reserve the right to publicly denounce violations when they are major and repeated, when confidential dialogue has failed, and when it is in the best interest of the affected populations. The situation in Myanmar unequivocally meets all three criteria.

The Call for Enforcement

If the ICRC can allow the military junta to exploit the ICRC’s presence to parade Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in front of cameras in a deliberate staged show to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the world while over twenty thousand unnamed, un-profiled political prisoners endure unimaginable torture in the junta’s prisons, the ICRC can no longer claim its silence is serving the victims.

The people of Myanmar are not asking the ICRC to step outside its humanitarian mandate, nor are we asking the ICRC to abandon its core mission. However, we are demanding the strict enforcement of ICRC’s own operational guidelines and of international human rights standards. The ICRC should not allow itself to be used as a prop by those who slaughter civilians.

In addition, we urgently call upon the ICRC to enforce a principled position and prioritize the lives of Myanmar’s people. The ICRC must immediately trigger its internal guidelines to publicly denounce the military junta’s repeated violations of IHL, openly recognizing that confidential dialogue has completely failed.

Furthermore, the ICRC must insist on regular, independent and unimpeded access to all political prisoners and places of detention, free from the presence or interference of junta personnel. Any engagement with detainees, including State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, must be conducted solely for humanitarian purposes and must not be exploited for political theatre or public relations. The ICRC should prioritize facilitating meaningful family contact, including with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s son, Kim Aris, in accordance with its humanitarian mandate, while refusing participation in any military junta-staged photo opportunities or engagements that manufacture legitimacy for the junta.

History will not judge the ICRC by how strictly it adhered to its bylaws in a vacuum, but by whether it had the courage to recognize when those bylaws were being exploited and manipulated by the military junta. We urge the ICRC to reassess its purpose and strategy, to demand true, unmanipulated access to all political prisoners, and to stop allowing its confidentiality to be extracted for the junta’s legitimacy.

State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is the legitimate leader of Myanmar and continues to be recognized as such by the United Nations (UN). For the ICRC to allow itself to be used by the military junta for its political gain in response to ASEAN and world leaders demanding direct access to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the ICRC is participating in the exploitation of the democratically elected leader of the Myanmar people. This is entirely unacceptable. Human suffering in Myanmar is not a confidential matter. ICRC’s response to it should not be either.

The people of Myanmar do not question the importance of humanitarian engagement. We question whether humanitarian engagement can continue to fulfil its purpose when it is exploited and manipulated to legitimize those responsible for widespread violations of international humanitarian law. The credibility of the ICRC depends not only on preserving access, but also on ensuring that such access does not come at the expense of the very people it pledges to protect.

The people of Myanmar deserve an answer: How will the ICRC hold itself accountable to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the people of Myanmar? What safeguards will the ICRC put in place to ensure that future humanitarian engagement cannot again be exploited as political propaganda by the illegal criminal junta?

For more information, please contact:

Khin Ohmar, Progressive Voice; info@progressive-voice.org
Salai Za Uk Ling, Chin Human Rights Organization; zauk@chinhumanrights.org
Debbie Stothard, ALTSEAN-BURMA; debbie@altsean.org
Karen Ames, US Campaign for Burma; karen@uscampaignforburma.org

Signed by 155 civil society organizations, including 2 organizations that have chosen not to disclose their names:

5/ Lapantang Strike Column
5/ of Zaya State Strike Committee
A3Y (Area 3 Youths)
Action Committee for Democracy Development (ACDD)
All Arakan Students’ & Youths’ Congress (AASYC)
ALTSEAN-Burma
Anti-Junta Alliance Yangon – AJAY
Anti-junta Forces Coordination Committee – Mandalay (AFCC – Mandalay)
Anyar Pyit Taing Htaung Lay Myar Strike Committee
Arakan Youth Peace Network
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
Association of Human Rights Defenders and Promoters (HRDP)
Association of Spring Rainbow (ASR)
Athan – Freedom of Expression Activist Organization
Aung San Suu Kyi Park Norway
Ayadaw Strike Committee
Ayeyarwaddy West Development Organisation (AWDO), Magway
Ayeyarwaddy West Development Organisation (AWDO), Nagphe
Blood Money Campaign (BMC)
Board of Education Kyaukpadaung
Budalin Strike Force
Burmese Atheists
Burmese Women’s Union (BWU)
Campaign for a New Myanmar
CDM Medical Network (CDMMN)
Center for Action Points (CAP)
Chin Community in Norway
Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO)
Chindwin Riverside Villages Strike Committee
Civil Information Network (CIN)
Creative Home (CH)
CRPH Support Group, Norway and members organizations
Dagon University Student’s Union (DUSU)
Defend Myanmar Democracy (DMD)
Democratic Party for a New Society, Norway
Doh Atu – Ensemble pour le Myanmar
Educational Initiatives Myanmar
Equality Myanmar (EQMM)
Ethnic Youth General Strike Committee (Mandalay)
Federal Myanmar Tourism Committee
Federal Myanmar Tourism Union
Federation of Basic Education Worker Unions (FBEWU)
Free Burma Campaign (South Africa) (FBC(SA)
General Strike Collaboration Committee (GSCC)
General Strike Coordination Body – GSCB
Generation Wave (GW)
Hpakant Hmawlae Strike Force
Human Rights Educators’ Network (HREN)
Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM)
India for Myanmar
Info Birmanie
International Campaign for the Rohingya
Justice & Equality Focus (JEF)
Justice For Myanmar (JFM)
K’cho Ethnic Association (Europe)
Kachin Association Norway
Kachin Human Rights Watch (KHRW)
Kachin Women’s Association Thailand (KWAT)
Kalay Township People’s Strike Steering Committee – KPSSC
Kani Township Strike Steering Committee
Kantbalu Township Strike Force
Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG)
Karen Peace Support Network (KPSN)
Karen Women’s Organization (KWO)
Karen Youth Organization – KYO
Karenni Human Rights Group (KnHRG)
Karenni National Women’s Organization (KNWO)
Keng Tung Youth
Kyae Lak Myay
Kyauktada Strike Committee (KSC)
Latpadaung Anti-coup Strike Force
Latpadaung Region Strike Committee
LGBT Alliance Myanmar
Magway People’s Revolution Committee
Magway Region Human Rights Network
Mandalay Medical Family (MFM)
Mandalay Regional Youth Association – Revolution Core Group (MRYA – RCG)
Mandalay Strike Force (MSF)
MayMyo Strike Force
Metta Campaign Mandalay
MilkTeaAlliance Calendar Team
Monywa People’s Strike Steering Committee
Monywa-Amyint Road Strike Committee
Myanmar Accountability Project (MAP)
Myanmar Catholic Community In Norway
Myanmar Community in Norway
Myanmar Hindu Union
Myanmar Labour Alliance (MLA)
Myanmar People Alliance (Shan State)
Myanmar Women Peace and Security (M-WPS)
Myaung People Strike Steering Committee
MyaYar Knowledge Tree
Myingyan Civilian Movement Committee
Network for Human Rights Documentation-Burma (ND-Burma)
New Myanmar Foundation
New Rehmonnya Federated Force – NRFF
NLD Organization Committee (International) Norway
No Business With Genocide
Nonviolence International
Norway Matu Community
Norway Rvwang Community
OCTOPUS (Youth Organization)
Pakokku Youth Development Council (PYDC)
Pale People’s Strike Steering Committee
People Movement Platform Myanmar
Progressive Voice (PV)
Queers of Burma Alternative (QBA)
Rohingya Community in Norway
Rohingya Maìyafuìnor Collaborative Network (RMCN)
RW Welfare society (RWWS)
Sagaing Forum Federation
SEA Junction
Shan MATA
Shwebo Strike Force
Sisters 2 Sisters
Sitt Nyein Pann Foundation (SNPF)
Southern Initiative (SI)
Southern Youth Development Organization
Spring Friends
Synergy – Social Harmony Organization
Thint Myat Lo Thu Myar Organization
University of Medicine Mandalay Student Union Revolutionary Front – UMMSURF
University Students’ Unions Alumni Force
US Campaign for Burma
Volunteers in Myanmar
Wetlet Strike Committee
White Coat Society Yangon (WCSY)
Women Advocacy Coalition – Myanmar (WAC-M)
Women Alliance Burma (WAB)
Women Lead Resource Center
Women’s League of Burma (WLB)
Women’s Organization of Political Prisoners (WOPP)
Women’s Peace Network
Yadanabon University Students’ Union (YDNBUSU)
Yain Nweh Par (Rainbow Win The Storm – RIS)
Yangon Deaf Group
Yinmarbin-Sarlingyi All Villages People Strike Leading Committee
Youth Empowerment
Youth for Democratization of Myanmar (UDM)
Youth Resources Strike Committee – Chaung U Township
Zomi Christian Fellowship of Norway
Zomi Community Norway
ကမ်းလက်ကူ
ဂန့်ဂေါဖွံ့ဖြိုးတိုးတက်ရေးအဖွဲ့
တူမီးစာစဉ်အဖွဲ့
ပြည်သူ့သပိတ်အင်အားစု
ပွင့်ဖြူဖွံ့ဖြိုးတိုးတက်ရေးအဖွဲ့
ဖားကန့်မှော်လှည့်သပိတ်
မင်းဘူးတောင်သူများအစုအဖွဲ့။
မင်းလှတောင်သူများအစုအဖွဲ့။
မလိအင်မိုင်ဇွပ် အမျိးသမီးအဖွဲ
ရှမ်းမြောက် လီဆူအမျိုးသမီးများအဖွဲ့
သမိုင်းသယ်ဆောင်သူများ

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

August 7, 2026/in ND-Burma Members' Reports, Press Releases and Statements

[BANGKOK, 7 August 2026] We, the undersigned 146 Myanmar, regional, and international civil society organizations, express deep alarm and concern regarding reports that the junta-controlled Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) has announced its intention to assume the Chairship of the Southeast Asia National Human Rights Institutions Forum (SEANF) in 2027, following discussions during the second Technical Working Group Meeting of SEANF held in Malaysia from 21 to 23 July 2026.

We urge SEANF members to take a principled stand and prevent the MNHRC from assuming any leadership position within SEANF and to urgently review its continued membership in the Forum. Allowing the MNHRC to chair SEANF would not only seriously undermine the credibility, legitimacy, and integrity of a regional human rights mechanism established to advance human rights protection in Southeast Asia, but would embolden the MNHRC to further provide the criminal military junta with a shield from international accountability.

SEANF’s credibility must be grounded in international human rights standards

SEANF’s credibility as a regional network of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) depends on its commitment to the standards it seeks to promote. As a mechanism established to strengthen human rights protection in Southeast Asia, SEANF must ensure that its membership and leadership are consistent with the principles of independence, pluralism, and effectiveness enshrined in the UN Paris Principles.

Providing leadership roles to institutions that no longer meet these standards risks undermining confidence in SEANF among civil society organizations, human rights defenders, and communities affected by human rights violations.

MNHRC’s failure to comply with the Paris Principles

MNHRC’s continued membership and its boldness of seeking to assume the SEANF Chairship raise serious concerns regarding the Forum’s commitment to international minimum NHRI standards.

Following a review by the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA), MNHRC’s “B” status accreditation was removed in December 2024 due to its failure to comply with the UN Paris Principles. The SCA raised serious concerns regarding MNHRC’s independence, its failure to effectively fulfil its mandate following the military’s 2021 illegal coup attempt, inadequate engagement with civil society and the international human rights system, and concerns regarding its appointment process and being complicit in the military junta’s human rights violations and atrocity crimes.

Following the removal of its accreditation, MNHRC’s membership in GANHRI was formally removed in March 2025, and the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions (APF) subsequently removed MNHRC from its membership in May 2025.

These decisions clearly demonstrate that MNHRC no longer meets the standards expected of an independent and effective NHRI. Civil society organizations have consistently called upon SEANF to take similar action and remove MNHRC from its network in order to uphold the integrity of regional NHRI mechanisms and to avoid the risk of being complicit in the MNHRC’s protection of the perpetrators.

MNHRC has failed to protect human rights in Myanmar

Since the 2021 illegal military coup attempt, MNHRC has failed to act as an independent institution capable of protecting victims and holding perpetrators accountable for widespread and systematic human rights violations committed by the Myanmar military.

Rather than independently investigating and addressing violations, MNHRC has failed to challenge the actions of the military junta or provide effective protection or access to justice to victims of serious violations, including arbitrary detention, torture, sexual violence, deaths in custody, enforced disappearances, massacres and airstrikes and ground attacks against civilians, including children.

Through its actions and omissions, MNHRC has contributed to efforts by the military junta to project an appearance of human rights oversight while failing to provide any accountability and protection for victims and survivors.

Increased public engagements cannot restore lost legitimacy

The undersigned organizations are further concerned that MNHRC has recently increased its public engagements and international outreach despite losing recognition within the international NHRI system.

Its reported engagements–including a meeting with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on 17 July 2026 and with the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Russian Federation on 10 July–appear designed to increase its international visibility in the military junta’s post-sham-election rebrand in civilian disguise. However, public engagements cannot substitute for genuine independence, accountability, and compliance with the Paris Principles.

The Russian Commissioner for Human Rights has also faced serious scrutiny within the international NHRI community, including the removal of its accreditation following GANHRI-SCA findings concerning its compliance with the Paris Principles and its response to serious human rights violations in the context of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.

SEANF members must ensure none of their engagements are used to normalize MNHRC’s role within regional and international human rights spaces without addressing the fundamental concerns that led to the removal of its accreditation and memberships.

SEANF must act to protect its integrity

Allowing MNHRC to assume the SEANF Chairship would cause a public outcry and severely damage the credibility and public trust required for the Forum to function effectively. Civil society organizations and human rights defenders cannot meaningfully engage with a regional mechanism that provides leadership to an institution acting as a smokescreen for a criminal military junta. This junta has been found by the international NHRI community to be non-compliant with the Paris Principles and has failed to protect the human rights of Myanmar’s peoples.

We therefore call upon SEANF members to prevent MNHRC from assuming the Chairship of SEANF in 2027 and to take immediate steps towards its formal removal from the Forum. SEANF must ensure that its membership and leadership positions are held only by institutions that demonstrate independence, credibility, and genuine commitment to human rights protection, while taking concrete measures to safeguard its integrity as a credible and effective regional platform for human rights cooperation and advancement.

For more information, please contact:

The CSO Working Group on Independent National Human Rights Institution (Burma/Myanmar); WG_NHRI@protonmail.com
Asian NGO Network on National Human Rights Institutions Secretariat, FORUM-ASIA; anni@forum-asia.org

Signed by 146 civil society organizations, including one organization that has chosen not to disclose its name:

5/ Lapantang Strike Column
5/ of Zaya State Strike Committee
A New Burma (ANB)
Action Committee for Democracy Development (ACDD)
Activate Rights, Bangladesh
Akila India Kattida Thozilalargal Madhya Sangam (AIKTMS) INDIA
All India Network of NGOs and Individuals Working with National and State Human Rights Institutions (AiNNI)
Alternative ASEAN Network on Burma (ALTSEAN-BURMA)
Anti-Junta Alliance Yangon – AJAY
Anti-junta Forces Coordination Committee – Mandalay (AFCC – Mandalay)
Anyar Pyit Taing Htaung Lay Myar Strike Committee
Asia Democracy Network (ADN)
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
Asia Human Rights and Labour Advocates (AHRLA)
Asian Cultural Forum on Development (ACFOD)
Asian NGO Network on National Human Rights Institutions (ANNI)
Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP)
Association of Human Rights Defenders and Promoters (HRDP)
Athan – Freedom of Expression Activist Organization
Awaz Foundation Pakistan: Centre for Development Services (AwazCDS-Pakistan)
Ayadaw Strike Committee
Bali Legal Aid (YLBHI/LBH Bali)
Bhawan Nirman Karmakar Majdoor Union (BNKMU)
Budalin Strike Force
Building and wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
Building and Woodworkers International (BWI)
Burma Action Ireland
Burma Campaign UK (BCUK)
Burma Human Rights Network
Burma Monitor
Burma Solidarity Philippines (BSP)
Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK (BROUK)
Burmese Women’s Union (BWU)
Bytes For All, Pakistan
Campaign for Popular Democracy
CDM Medical Network (CDMMN)
Centre for Human Rights and Development, Mongolia
Chindwin Riverside Villages Strike Committee
Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW)
CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
Civil Information Network (CIN)
Civil Rights Defenders (CRD)
Civil Society and Human Rights Network, Afghanistan (CSHRN)
Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS), Indonesia
Construction Workers Union of NTUF (CWU-NTUF)
Creative Home (CH)
CSO Working Group on Independent National Human Rights Institution (Burma/Myanmar)
Dagon University Student’s Union (DUSU)
Defence of Human Rights, Pakistan
Dignity, Kazakhstan
Educational Initiatives Prague
Equality Myanmar (EQMM)
Ethnic Youth General Strike Committee (Mandalay)
Federation of Basic Education Worker Unions (FBEWU)
Federation of Free Worker (FFW)
Future Light Center (FLC)
General Strike Collaboration Committee (GSCC)
General Strike Coordination Body – GSCB
Generation Wave (GW)
Greater Equitable Measures (GEM), Malaysia
Hpakant Hmawlae Strike Force
Human Rights Alert, India
Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM)
Humanitarian Solidarity for the People of Myanmar (SKRM)
IMPARSIAL, the Indonesian Human Rights Monitor.
Independent Educators Union (INERU Indonesia)
Indonesian Airport Workers Union Federation (FSPBI/ITF)
Info Birmanie
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
Joint Action for NHRI and OP in Japan, Japan
Judicial System Monitoring Program, Timor-Leste
Justice & Equality Focus (JEF)
Kachin Women’s Association Thailand (KWAT)
Kalay Township People’s Strike Steering Committee -KPSSC
Kani Township Strike Steering Committee
Kantbalu Township Strike Force
Karapatan Alliance Philippines
Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG)
Karen Women’s Organization (KWO)
Karenni Human Rights Group (KnHRG)
Karenni National Women’s Organization (KNWO)
Keng Tung Youth
Korean House of International Solidarity
Koreksi.org (independent media)
Kyae Lak Myay
Latpadaung Anti-coup Strike Force
Latpadaung Region Strike Committee
Law & Society Trust (LST), Sri Lanka
LGBT Alliance Myanmar
Loka Ahlinn
Madhya Pradesh Theka Shramik Mazdoor Congress (MPTSMC)
Magway People’s Revolution Committee
Maldivian Democracy Network (MDN)
Mandalay Medical Family (MFM)
Mandalay Strike Force (MSF)
Marsinah.Id (independent media)
MayMyo Strike Force
Metta Campaign Mandalay
Monywa People’s Strike Steering Committee
Monywa-Amyint Road Strike Committee
Myanmar Labour Alliance (MLA)
Myanmar People Alliance (Shan State)
Myanmar Women, Peace and Security (M-WPS)
Myaung People Strike Steering Committee
Myingyan Civilian Movement Committee
National Union of Building and Construction Workers (NUBCW)
Network for Human Rights Documentation – Burma (ND-Burma)
Odhikar, Bangladesh
Pale People’s Strike Steering Committee
People’s Empowerment Foundation,Thailand
Politics for Women Myanmar
Progressive Voice (PV)
Pusat KOMAS, Malaysia
Refugee and Migratory Movements Research Unit (RMMRU), Bangladesh
Rohingya Maìyafuìnor Collaborative Network (RMCN)
RW Welfare society (RWWS)
Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU)
Shan MATA
Shwebo Strike Force
Spirit in Education Movement (SEM),Thailand
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
Surabaya Legal Aid (YLBHI/LBH Surabaya)
Sushil Pyakurel, Nepal
Synergy – Social Harmony Organization
Ta’ang Women’s Organization (TWO)
Taiwan Association for Human Rights
Tamilnadu Congress Thozhilalar Union (TCTU), India
Task Force Detainees of the Philippines
Thai Action Committee for Democracy in Burma (TACDB)
The Awakening, Pakistan
The Federation of people union (SERBUK) Indonesia
Union for Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES)
University of Medicine Mandalay Student Union Revolutionary Front – UMMSURF
University Students’ Unions Alumni Force
US Campaign for Burma
Uttar pradesh Gramin Mazdoor Sangthan (Upgms)
Wetlet Strike Committee
White Coat Society Yangon (WCSY)
Women Advocacy Coalition – Myanmar (WAC-M)
Women Alliance Burma (WAB)
Women’s Peace Network
Women’s Rehabilitation Center (WOREC), Nepal
Yadanabon University Students’ Union (YDNBUSU)
Yinmarbin-Sarlingyi All Villages People Strike Leading Committee
Youth Resources Strike Committee – Chaung U Township

Other Human Rights Reports

Human rights situation in Myanmar plummets to new low amid unrelenting violations and unregulated exploitation of natural resources – UN reportAugust 26, 2026 - 8:34 am
GENEVA – The human rights situation in Myanmar, in particular that of minority communities, has plummeted to a new low, from the ever-worsening brutal abuse of the Rohingya population to the devastating impact of illicit economies, notably illegal mining for rare earths, a new UN Human Rights report has found. The report details how unrelenting violence and a […]

Spring Revolution

Civil Society Position Paper on ASEAN’s Goal of a Myanmar-Owned and -Led SolutionDecember 18, 2024 - 12:11 pm
Recommendations to ASEAN and Its Member States (1) Move beyond the 5PC to achieve a Myanmar people-led and people-centered solution to the crisis in Myanmar. ASEAN’s “Myanmar-owned and -led” approach must be backed by genuine political will that aligns with and supports the collective aspirations of the people of Myanmar. (2) Cease all pressure on […]
The Airstrikes after the journey to the China of the Junta Military LeaderDecember 10, 2024 - 1:28 pm
Operation 1027 was a coordinated military attack against the junta on October 27th, 2023. It was carried out by the Northern Brotherhood, which includes the Arakan Army, Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, and the Ta’ang National Liberation Army. Several months later, the Three Brotherhood Alliance held three meetings to negotiate with China on January 11 […]

Multimedia

GenocideSeptember 2, 2025 - 9:42 am
Crimes Against HumanityJune 16, 2025 - 7:55 am
International Humanitarian Law Cartoon AnimatonApril 29, 2025 - 8:37 am
အတိတ်မှ ဆိုးရွားသည့် အကြီးအကျယ် လူ့အခွင့်အရေးချိုးဖောက်မှုများ ထပ်မံမဖြစ်ပွားစေရေးအ တွက် အာမခံခြင်း (Guarantees of non-recurrence)February 10, 2025 - 9:58 am

ND Burma

ND-Burma formed in 2004 in order to provide a way for Burma human rights organizations to collaborate on the human rights documentation process. The 13 ND-Burma member organizations seek to collectively use the truth of what communities in Burma have endured to advocate for justice for victims. ND-Burma trains local organizations in human rights documentation; coordinates members’ input into a common database using Martus, a secure open-source software; and engages in joint-advocacy campaigns.

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Protecting Humanity: Enforcing the ICRC Mandate in Myanmar – An Open Letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Joint Statement: SEANF Must Deny the Junta-controlled Myanmar Commission the 2027 Chairship to Protect Regional Credibility

ND Burma

Contact

Office Hours